Can we do it again?
It would be great if we could tag on another 100 points and blow through all the recent highs, break out of orbit and leave all the cares of the world behind us:
No more declining dollar. No more ballooning deficit. No more rising commodities. No more declining housing market. No option scandals…
Up here in Spaceship Market we don’t concern ourselves with such mundane, earthly matters. Dow 15,000 is so close up here we can almost reach out and touch it – we just need a little more fuel!
Chinese demand doesn’t seem like such a big deal from 220 miles up and we can hardly even see Iraq, North Korea, Nigeria, Chad, Fiji (coup today) and who can even tell where Iran is pointing their missiles at or where Kim Jong Il is testing his.

Perspective is a wonderful thing for those of us who can afford to have it!
Let’s’ just remember where we all fit in in the GRAND scheme of things as we all click on our mice and move our little virtual piles of virtual money about while we avoid contemplating that this is just one of 125 Billion galaxies in the known universe and there are 100 Billion stars in just the Milky Way yet we are very likely the only species on any of the possibly 1 Trillion local planets that goes around thinking that the whole thing belongs to us.
Just something to think about for those of you who complain that your purchase of an option caused the stock to dip!
Back here on Earth I’m getting some annoying warnings from my own navigational computers that are saying something about not having enough fuel to break orbit as we’ve taken on an additional $2.4 Trillion in extra weight since the summer but we’re going to ignore that flashing red light until it starts beeping… What? Oh it’s beeping… Well just turn up CNBC really loud so we can ignore that too!
Perspective (or lack of it) will be very imprortant this week as we try to make the same levels we didn’t quite make yesterday.
The Hang Seng is back on a tear with a 241 point gain, taking them close to 19,000 again (not reflected in this chart), a party caused by Hong Kong dropping plans for a “goods and services tax.“ Oil stocks dragged down the Nikkei, despite a rebound in oil prices in overseas trading.
CHA rose 15.6% and CN gained 8.5% on expectations they will win licenses for 3G Networks. This will be a negative for CHL but not too bad and a big plus for all the phone suppliers who have 1.2Bn people awaiting next generation phones. Those MOT Jan ‘08 $22.50s of ours have so many ways to pay off!
Europe is up a bit this morning and I think they finally get it and are willing to move on without us. A lot of European traders they interview are looking East a lot more often than they are looking West when discussing business prospects.
Remember when you look at that globe, Russia is part of Europe now! When we talk about the Western Power block, it’s just US, Canada and Mexico (because Central and South America certainly want little to do with us) over on our side of the planet…
We’ll see today how our policy of de facto isolationism is paying off for us as the markets take a major test of our comfort levels:
- Dow 12,300 is a must! Failure at 12,299 or less.
- It’s not going to happen without Transports at 2,650
- S&P made a new high yesterday and needs to lead us to 1,420 but let’s be happy with 1,410
- NYSE also breaks new ground and 9,050 would be great
- Nasdaq breaks out at 2,469 – fails under 2,450
- SOX need to show us the money over 490
- RUT will test 800 and must hold 790
If we can break these levels, not even $65 oil can weigh us down! Productivity numbers are OK and costs are under control, housing looks like the worst may actually be over and a weak dollar may force some sector rotation we haven’t been getting before.
So we can be optimistic but very cautiously so. As I said yesterday, the pattern forming is very similar to the one we had just before Thanksgiving, so now we’ll get to see what kind of follow-through we get in a non-holiday week.
Oil is getting a mega pump in European trading this morning and will retest my $63.09 target from below. If we can form a cieling here, we may finally be ready for the next leg down in prices.
It’s still all about the dollar and gold will tell the tale (as it’s hard to track to buck intraday). We REALLY need to bounce the dollar off the 82.50 level otherwise the next stop is 2.5% further down the road, just above 80 (a tragic 2 year low).
A bounce in the dollar will send gold down fast so keep an eye on the $650 line to see if we hold it. Absolutely out of the ABX calls if gold fails to hold it!
=====================================
SNY is the anti-Pfizer today with a very good result from Acomplia in phase 2 studies. They face heavy problems from generics on their main lines but the Mar $45s were $1.80 last night and I’ll want to look at them if they are not too crazy at the open.
U.S. Mortgage delinquencies have doubled in ‘06 causing a ripple effect in the $10T mortgage market. 4% over 60 days may not seem like much but that’s $400Bn missing from some banker’s ledger at the end of each month. That’s a lot of money – just ask Uncle Billy!
Who are the bankers who get hurt the most? Usually it’s sub-prime lenders but most of them have been bought up the past few years by Investment Banks like MS, MER and BSC. They are scary to short but see my comments yesterday about what happens when you have too few people with too much money!
Retailers are cutting back on free shipping. If I had to have something confirm that it’s a great on-line shopping season that would be it! They are doing so well they don’ need no stinkin’ perks…
No free shipping means AMZN users have all the more reason to be loyal as they have a club plan that’s been very popular (and initially painful for Amazon) so let’s keep an eye on them but, as I said earlier, the best play there is to short them on Christmas Eve.
EBAYheld the 200 dma and is being met by the rising 50 dma by the week’s end so we may get a pop there with the $32.50s at just .60 but there are so many people on that side of the trade it worries me. I’d rather play the Jan $32.50s on a drop to around yesterday’s low of $1.25 if we get so lucky.
Balmer finally made an attemptto talk up MSFT’s stock and they really need something to break $30 but I don’t think 13% growth is what people were looking for. I don’t get it myself unless they just don’t think Vista will win a lot of converts.
If we don’t hold my admittedly greedy levels, let’s take the “rally” with a grain of salt, the air is pretty thin up here and we might just be getting a little giddy.

December 5, 2006 at 9:27 am |
I am going to repost my posts this morning on your yesterday wrap up.
Phil
What are your thoughts on BUD as a long term call play?
1st ztr addict Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 9:14 am
Looks like SIRI is missing its sales targets… 5.9-6.1M instead of the projected 6.3M
1st ztr addict Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 9:18 am
For the HB guys
Toll Brothers (TOL) is trading down 2% in the pre-market forecasting $1.58 – $2.08 versus consensus of $2.30. The company indicated that in the metro D.C. suburbs of northern Virginia seems to have stabilized.
December 5, 2006 at 9:49 am |
LVS Puts looking nice
December 5, 2006 at 9:54 am |
Ah ha! I answered them in yesterday’s post!
I’m not sorry I’m out of TOL, I would have certainly sold here anyway for an extra .20, not worth the risk of hearing earnings that don’t justify this move anyway….
December 5, 2006 at 9:56 am |
LVS – I mean come on! The numbers just do not work… Be careful though, logic is not a big seller in this market!
December 5, 2006 at 9:57 am |
MOT finally moving up..
December 5, 2006 at 9:57 am |
Phil, where you gonna bail out of the LVS Dec 90’s?
December 5, 2006 at 9:59 am |
XOM Jan $75s for .90! How can I not?
December 5, 2006 at 10:03 am |
U.S. Oct. factory orders down 4.7% vs. down 4% expected
U.S. Oct. factory orders ex-transportation fall 0.8%
U.S. Nov. ISM services 58.9% vs 57.1% in Oct.
U.S. Nov. ISM services above consensus 55.8%
December 5, 2006 at 10:05 am |
LVS – I think they were way too high, I’m willing to wait this one out all the way back to a new high before I reconsider.
MOT is not a stock for impatient people…
December 5, 2006 at 10:09 am |
Thanks for the data MJ… looks like a rocky day ahead
December 5, 2006 at 10:14 am |
phil your take on SIRI?….
December 5, 2006 at 10:14 am |
Did we miss the boat on SBUX for this round?
December 5, 2006 at 10:17 am |
SBUX getting away! Missed it even though I called the bottom last week (kick, kick).
YUM recovering nicely as they doubled their dividend and no one actually died at Taco Bell! They’re lucky it was NJ – we’re used to all sorts of toxic substances here, a little E Coli is nothing….
CME quietly heads to $550 like it’s no big deal…
Transports holding back the Dow. Dow up but no real strength when you look at the actual components – oil will kill it if it goes up over $63.09.
December 5, 2006 at 10:19 am |
Anyone think it makes sense to start small put positions in DIA, Q’s and SP’s for Jan 08 and build them over time?
December 5, 2006 at 10:23 am |
OIH looking nice and weak given the pumping oils.
SLB held it up yesterday; today its dragging it down.
December 5, 2006 at 10:25 am |
Cramer just posted this:
Exxon (XOM – commentary – Cramer’s Take), Chevron (CVX – commentary – Cramer’s Take) and now ConocoPhillips (COP – commentary – Cramer’s Take) are in short supply. There simply isn’t enough to go around. It’s unbelievable that these gigantic stocks, with a giant amount of equity, just can’t be bought without moving the stocks higher.
Conoco’s now going higher because it, too, has embraced the Exxon model of sucking up the supply. I prefer the Chevron model, the dividend and the buyback. Chevron should announce another gigantic buyback when its $5 billion buyback is completed.
I like the Deutsche Bank piece on ConocoPhillips; it gives you a reason, short-term, to buy: “Capex cut, buyback up, raising to buy.” Longer-term, though, it would be good to keep all steady and give us a higher dividend. But I think the Chevron downgrade by Banc of America is just plain stupid. I expected better from them.
Short-term, I have to admit that these buybacks are working because they mopped up such supply that there’s just no place to go but up when the real buyers come in.
December 5, 2006 at 10:27 am |
SIRI: “The new forecast, at the low end, represents a growth rate nearly 20% above that of 2005. The range works out to net subscriber additions of between 2.6 million and 2.8 million, or year-over-year-subscriber growth of 80% to 85%. ”
Oh my Gosh!!! SELL SELL SELL!!!!
Wow, there is just no pleaseing some people. Growth 20% above the year they added Howard (he came on 1/9 but, of course people bought raidios before that day).
I guess when you have to measure everything against XOM gaining 70% in 4 months it’s hard to get excited about the little guys….
Somebody has a big bid above me at $3.75 but I’ll wait and see what happens.
December 5, 2006 at 10:27 am |
CVX headed south
December 5, 2006 at 10:30 am |
Market seems to be taking the bad data really well. Anyone’s thoughts?
December 5, 2006 at 10:31 am |
It is all how you spin it Ray
“Stocks rose on Tuesday after stronger-than-expected data on the services sector boosted optimism about U.S. economic growth and profits.”
December 5, 2006 at 10:34 am |
Cramer – at the same time as he’s telling you the retail buyers are overpaying on the way in he’s telling his retail buyers to BUYBUYBUY – no wonder they have 2 of him in the new commercials, he’s gone totally schitzo!
DIA, Qs, SPY – puts yes, calls no. This is the 7th hour of a 150 point jump in the market – you MAY be overpaying a bit for the calls…
Taking 1/2 my XOM’s off for $1.10 (same as yesterday’s CVX play) to reduce the basis to .70 and stop out at .95 if it goes back up. These are not greedy plays, just nice ways to pick up some cash.
If you are going to play the big indexes, try to play it like that, pick a top, sell into the dip and always be ready to bail.
December 5, 2006 at 10:39 am |
Tom, if you are out there, would still like to hear your thoughts on the best play on the builders since you have officially called the bottom…
Thanks.
December 5, 2006 at 10:46 am |
What’s down with oil, somebody declare world peace or is this more global warming stuff? I’ve been on the sidelines except for a few small put positions until the directionality shakes out a bit.
Interesting to see the brokers starting to treat XOM and its peers with the same kind of nerve they gave AAPL when it broke though price targets last year. Just raise the target MULTIPLE. That way, you don’t have to raise estimates or, heaven forbid, lower your rating.
December 5, 2006 at 10:46 am |
Lookin at XLE $60 puts for .85 but will pay .90 is oil breaks below $62 – oops there it goes while I’m writing!
December 5, 2006 at 10:47 am |
Bad data? What bad data……LOL
M
December 5, 2006 at 10:48 am |
Don’t trust OIL going down. It will be back up in a Jiffy. XOM is waiting to break upwards
or maybe it won’t now that I am in the calls…..
December 5, 2006 at 10:48 am |
My… oil futures are taking a nice dive and for once bringing XOM & Co. down with them. Did the levitation engine run out of, dare I say it?… Fuel?
Out of curiosity, anyone knows what’s happened? I wouldn’t believe it could be anything as mundane as gravity reminding itself to the flying market.
Anyway, been lurking the past few weeks and certainly enjoy the insights I found here which are helping along with my learning curve and registered for the pro site.
So hi everyone!
December 5, 2006 at 10:50 am |
Oil down .80 to $61.40 – dollar bounce as predicted.
December 5, 2006 at 10:50 am |
Hi Phil, Wow Cramer has been one of Sirius’ big Mel Pumpers and he just came out with this:
I know for a fact that this management team was not going to make a call on sales until closer to Christmas. But the downward revision in subscribers, to a range of 5.9 million to 6.1 million instead of the targeted 6.3 million, is the first big miss for the Karmazin team. It remains to be seen whether the miss was telegraphed in the stock or whether the equity now has to drop below the $4 level. To me, the latter seems more likely.
I have to tell you, I thought that without a merger with XM (XMSR – commentary – Cramer’s Take – Rating), these two companies might not create a lot of wealth in the next few years. Mel convinced me I was wrong.
I wasn’t. I blew it. I should have stuck to my guns. I feel embarrassed. And I don’t like it.
Mel had been money in the bank. Everyone deserves one strike. But in my league, two strikes and you’re out.
Even a half-strike more and you’re out in this satellite game. If Mel hits the low end of the range or doesn’t hit it at all — both entirely possible if sales don’t pick up in the next two weeks — this one’s done for, without a merger.
Should have stuck with my first view.
My bad.
I was going to buy at around 1.80 or so but may wait a bit now to see what happens.
Glenn
December 5, 2006 at 10:52 am |
Comments on AAPL today?
December 5, 2006 at 10:56 am |
Out of the rest of the XOMs at $1.10
December 5, 2006 at 10:57 am |
at the very least XOM has support at around 74…….why there?
Because that’s where Rex and his boys got handed a ton of “restricted” stock.
M
December 5, 2006 at 10:57 am |
Anyone looking at AMX? Looks like it is breaking out
December 5, 2006 at 10:58 am |
1st ztr, heck like I posted here last week, most HBs charts have very nice looking. You can pick any 2 or 3 you like in BHS BZH CTX DHI HOV KBH LEN PHM TOL and go the diversification lower risk rouite. They all show very nice breakouts from a multi-month base. I still can’t believe how funnymentalists could have been telling for months that the sector was to go down the drain. It’s up and up now! Could go both ways, talk to your financial advisor, you wife and your dog or cat first before investing. You might lose all your investment and pay less taxes. G/L
December 5, 2006 at 11:00 am |
1st ZTR addict …you may want to raise your stop in ZTR …I have held it for 20 years and I think it is about to go down …no big deal…it won’t move alot …but this time in the cycle it always pays to be ready to sit out for awhile…I am not sure whether it will be the BOND or Stock market or both that may crack soon …just a heads up .
Good luck. i am still bullish but I am insisting that there is something brewing ..either a blowoff up or the beginning of a selloff…I do know it is going to be what most do not expect and since 90% are bullish on both stocks and bonds …it probably won’t be pretty.
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 11:03 am |
I would have preferred AMX pull back – might never happen!
=================================
Listen to Tom, I should have had more faith in his chart but I chickened out on my TOL’s ahead of their report… I think this is some major overreaction to nothing special but belive me – TA beats FA in these situations….
December 5, 2006 at 11:05 am |
All time high on ICE!
December 5, 2006 at 11:06 am |
Hi Phil,
When do you go private? not in Dec.
December 5, 2006 at 11:11 am |
In the category of “you have no business being this high” : ECA – huge run to $53 from a bottom at $43 in early October.
–Limited upside to production – they cut targets for 2007 in October.
–Techincally it failed to make a new high with most of its peers.
–Estimates for 2007 have been dropping like a rock (down just under 20% in the last 3 months).
–Like XOM, ECA is on a quest to buyback its shares but it’s using proceeds from asset sales to fund the repurchase instead of just cash flow. So down the road, there’s likely to be less cashflow to go around. Either way, the buyback is just about done – it was 70% done a month ago when the stock was 13% lower.
–as of Sept 30 they had 1/3 of gas hedged which is pretty light compared to most of the sizeable gas players south of the Canadian border.
–these guys reduced their growth targets in the third quarter press release officially targeting buybacks for which they sold offshore Brazilian assets as well as gas storage facilities in North America instead of increased production growth becasue they are tired of paying high service costs and leary of gas prices.
December 5, 2006 at 11:16 am |
Tom2OC
How does the TA look on AAPL today?
December 5, 2006 at 11:20 am |
LOL, I’ve been posting on the other thread all day
December 5, 2006 at 11:24 am |
SLB downgraded because it desrves a premium but not this much of a premium. That and the fact that the KBR IPO is looking pretty sick is not good for HAL. Phil, I know you hate these guys but won’t buy puts on it but I just had to point it out because they had a helluva run and for those who say they’ve been beat up enough I point out that they’re up on the year so it’s not that bad. Just keeping an eye on it for now but in the new year they face a new congress and lower gas prices.
December 5, 2006 at 11:25 am |
Just shorted AAPL and GOOG and XLF
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 11:30 am |
Phil, “major overreaction”? I have no clue and you might be right on TOL but most HB charts have been bullish for weeks and weeks and this sector is moving higher now.
Arnie, I had some jitters on AAPL in recent days but the action of today is encouraging and the pattern is slowly morphing into a bullish handle. IF we can get green volume bar, odds are it will breakout over that 93 line in coming days. But show me the money first!
December 5, 2006 at 11:33 am |
Hey Tom2, I talked to my cat and he only wants me to buy petco! Lol!
December 5, 2006 at 11:35 am |
Thanks Tom
I tend to agree and changed my puts (at BE) against calls April 95
December 5, 2006 at 11:35 am |
TTT
wath is the address of your blog???
December 5, 2006 at 11:36 am |
What’s with the crossed bid/ask on AAPL?? 92.20/91.78
Been stuck there for a few minutes now
M
December 5, 2006 at 11:42 am |
Paul J, LOL! My dog reccomends PETM but I’m not convinced looking at the chart, but he must be right though.
December 5, 2006 at 11:43 am |
Phil,
is it good to buy XLE 60 dec puts
December 5, 2006 at 11:45 am |
TOMTHETRADER:
Good advice to put in a stop on ZTR; or just sell it outright. Its underperformed for years!
December 5, 2006 at 11:51 am |
What do you think of BBY here?
December 5, 2006 at 11:58 am |
V4 careful with BBY next week is earnings
December 5, 2006 at 12:13 pm |
Tom – I’ve been using your GOAX rules starting today and they seem like they’ll work. If I can recover my huge loss this year with your rule I’ll definitely buy you a triple cheeseburger
December 5, 2006 at 12:16 pm |
Phil
what’s the scoop on SIRI -did u manage to buy stock or calls?
December 5, 2006 at 12:21 pm |
Ray! LOL! Can’t wait! G/L!
December 5, 2006 at 12:29 pm |
Any thoughts on ANF? Looking weak!
December 5, 2006 at 12:40 pm |
RAY i used TOM2 rules and made my trade on TXN today with a nice profit and bought it back, looking for it to hold 29.80 range for the next leg up, i will not be holding for long looks weak any where over 30 near term.
Thanks TOM2 the way your going you’ll be making comercials for weight watchers!!!
December 5, 2006 at 12:55 pm |
aapl still bullish Tom ?
I see it inverted and about to implode…sell aapl , goog , heads up !!!
If aapl goes quick
http://www.tomthetrader@blogspot.com
December 5, 2006 at 1:00 pm |
You can’t get this from CNBC !
“Newsflash from Tehran
I am told that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, was rushed to the hospital last night with an unspecified heart problem. I hope to have more later. His health has been bad for some time, and last spring he was told by doctors that he probably had little more than a year to live.
The usual caveats: Rumors from Tehran are often totally fanciful, and my own grandmother was given six months to live by a smart New York City doctor when she was 55, and she was delighted to attend his funeral 25 years later.
But if Khamenei’s condition is really bad, the succession struggle—which is already well under way, as the recent attempt to limit Ahmadinezhad’s first term as president demonstrates—would become a real circus.”
——
“I” is not me. I am not the author of this.
December 5, 2006 at 1:05 pm |
Hi Tom,
What do you think about that HANS chart for a counter move on that triangle? Looks good today , entry might come on a pull back.
December 5, 2006 at 1:07 pm |
Rotational Correction
By Rev Shark
RealMoney.com Contributor
12/5/2006 12:49 PM EST
Click here for more stories by Rev Shark
I have been talking quite a bit lately about the possibility of a strong sector rotation. One of the primary reasons I believe this is likely is because of the large number of stocks trading at extreme levels. At the close last night, 83.56% of stocks were over their 40-day moving average. The last time this number was so high was back in June 2003.
If you look back at June 2003 (charts are posted here), you will see that the Nasdaq was far from a top. In fact, it continued to rally for another six months. However, what that extreme reading in June 2003 did indicate is that money was moving into technology and out of cyclical stocks.
I posted the charts of the Semiconductor HOLDRs (SMH), Pharmaceutical HOLDRs (PPH) and Oil Service HOLDRs (OIH) so you can see what happened to them in June 2003. Money flowed into SMH, which kept the Nasdaq moving while the extended PPH and OIH pulled back. This dropped the number of stocks that were above the 40-day average but allowed the market to keep running.
The lesson is very clear. When so many stocks are at extended levels, it doesn’t necessarily mean the market will correct, but it does greatly increase the chances of a rotational correction. I believe we are ripe for that to occur now.
December 5, 2006 at 1:07 pm |
Oil. Now what’s pumping this crap ?
All I can see is CNBC out with latest “news” that Deloitte survey says many OIL INDUSTRY execs (57%) see Oil going to 90 someday.
As for me; been in and out of Jan 135 puts. Sold ‘em earlier and just bought back in at 2.10 . After about 4 prior trades, my basis about 1.40.
December 5, 2006 at 1:12 pm |
Ah, just sold ‘em for 2.20. Super quick profit sometimes is too tempting to resist. Will buy ‘em back if OIH rallies.
December 5, 2006 at 1:13 pm |
Here comes the “BLOWOFF OR SELLOFF ” which will it be …I am sure by Friday at 4:00pm we will not be where we are now 12350 DOW
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 1:16 pm |
TTT, didn’t say I was bullish, said this: “action of today is encouraging” and I still believe so looking at the positive MF divergence on the intraday chart. I’ll review it EOD to see if that bullish handle is indeed in formation. Very very far from having shown me the money on the short side imho. No need to jump the gun. G/L.
Phil, If I not mistaken I believe you’re a fan of CAKE. It popped on a bearish scan of mine and looking at the chart this sure is stuck in a bearish patttern out there. I loaded a TA so you can see it.
December 5, 2006 at 1:19 pm |
BA Lufthansa to Order 20 Boeing 747s
Boeing gets order for two 787 Dreamliners from Nakash Grp
Arkia Israeli Air parent orders 2 Boeing 787-9 planes
December 5, 2006 at 1:20 pm |
Hi Sane_ trader! Yep, HANS going through a TA change of character today. Might be a good long play now on a pb. I’m moving it form the short watchlist to the long one. Thanks!
December 5, 2006 at 1:20 pm |
TOMTHETRADER posts starting to sound a little like TOMTHEPUMPER, this blog is great due to the fact that most posters provide a rational argument for their predictions.
December 5, 2006 at 1:21 pm |
Tom ..I know you go completely TA but some of your scans have to show everextension and you have to work in the fact that the TA in the SPY is showing danger. Are you totally happy with the way the market is performing ? The T4 level is considerd SAFE ? Would you cosider buying puts on any indexes just in case…Thanks and of course …it could go both ways …!!! I feel a stock like JPM and 1000 others are either ready to Blow off or sell off …don’t know how they can’t …the rubber band is not going to get much toghter.
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 1:24 pm |
Rational argument is the sentiment indicators have rarely supported a market at this level …rational ?
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 1:27 pm |
This is so Google:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061204/D8LQ6EE00.html
Does’nt understand does he??
M
December 5, 2006 at 1:31 pm |
BA- should have held on to those. They are going to get contract after contract before year-end. Each one putting a firmer bottom on the price and if the market cooperates, then up to $95.
We will get a bullish eia report tomorrow. I wouldn’t be short any energy into the report.
December 5, 2006 at 1:33 pm |
TTT’ I go day by day with my EOD GOAX review and so far since I started it late August I always kept a bullish bias on this market. As many were calling TOP! SELL! etc, I never changed my bullish bias. And right now I’ve got a rating of 5 on this market and this is on the bullish side so unless the rating turns bearish, this is calling for a strong santa rally coming up. Heck, got to follow my system, it does wonder for me and it is simple! G/L
December 5, 2006 at 1:34 pm |
STN – When a company is taken private, what happens to open OTM options?
December 5, 2006 at 1:37 pm |
It’s winter ..that means it is getting cold and will stay cold and demand will outstrip supply sometime in the next 6months and T.Boone will be right …oil …cash.
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 1:55 pm |
Oil up in 2010 says EIA (to $60 per barrel)
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=businessNews&storyID=2006-12-05T170930Z_01_N05411125_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-ENERGY-PROJECTION-PRICE.xml
December 5, 2006 at 1:59 pm |
TTT – that is a major call in this market – I wouldn’t short Apple or Goog in a crash!
======================================
TOL – I’ve been long on them since 11/28 but the earnings they gave were the earnings I feared. Also, I’m wondering if people in post WWI Gemany, before they collapsed into massive inflation, thought they were doing well because all their stuff was going up in value?
======================================
I like PETS better than PETM – As I said when I picked them in the 10s – It’s Meds for pets – what can go wrong?
======================================
XLE Dec $60 puts – no, you have to be willing (and have time) to DD on the position. I got dumped out of my CVX’s when I had to go just now but I didn’t set a stop on my XLE’s (as I only have my iniitial entry) and they haven’t done much so far.
On oil in general, this is the third day in a row that a big morning sell-off had to be rescued at 10:45
======================================
BBY stopped me out of the Jan $52.50s today – big disappointment! I don’t see a reason for it and it defies logic but I’ll be careful getting back in if it’s going to take a dive in this market.
CC sold calls stopped out too, I don’t know what’s up here but it makes me wonder what’s up.
Motley Fool stole my often used title for this article that actually explains nothing but gives us a possible clue:
http://biz.yahoo.com/fool/061205/116533703609.html?.v=1
=====================================
SIRI – no I don’t trust this market until the Transports take off. MSFT is still a mess and GE isn’t buying it so why should I?
That means I don’t chase. And the guy with a huge bid at 3.75 isn’t chasing either and he’s much richer than I am so I’m going to trust his instincts as well as my own.
=======================================
ANF – that’s why I sold the Jan $70s – I was getting worried it would take off on me! This is a purely fundamental play on their actual ability to make money coming through for me by Feb earnings (but my plan is to be out before them and I actually bought the Febs to make sure I wouldn’t be tempted to hold them into earnings).
My net cost on that trade was .30 so I really don’t care what it does as long as, on Jan 19th, my pre earnings Feb $72.50s are worth at least .30 more than the Jan $70s I sold.
========================================
Iran turning into a circus? What difference would it make? Are we worried someone rational would take over the country?
=======================================
Rotational Correction – that’s what I’ve been waiting for since August! I’ve been calling for a rotation into the Nas, preferably out of energy/commodities and banking. I have been encouraged by the RUT as well, these are generally nice, Democratic stocks.
================================
SLB going down no matter what happens… No oils are poking their heads up high ehough to take a chop at, which is very strange with oil rising.
Scary that they may be looking at the same thing I am – $63.09! Failing that will be a major problem.
Z – I’m thinking BTU is up 15% in 5 days right here and I like the $47.50 puts for a pullback – can you bless this trade on Thursday’s expected inventory?
================================
Stopped out of my PFE’s too! I hate going away in a choppy market!
================================
Can you believe they are expecting a build of 500Kb in crude and gasoline and a draw of just 400Kb in distillates? When exactly do we ever draw on these reserves?
December 5, 2006 at 2:06 pm |
Phil, my take is that if there is a crash it’s going to have to come from either AAPL or GOOG so for me, yes, short AAPL and/or GOOG in a crash and with both hands too. No crash in the radar for some time though but Mr. Market likes surprizes…
December 5, 2006 at 2:13 pm |
Thanks on CAKE, I just have the Jan $30s for .30 but I’m not looking to ride it to death if it’s breaking down. They had a downgrade this morning to sell by Merriman, who made a terrible call on them in February (an upgrade before the plunge) so I don’t trust their judgement and I’m holding but yes, they do look like they are much more likely to break down than break over the inverted 50 dma.
That being said, people are wrong and this is a great stock but I don’t fight TA anymore – you guys are too powerful!
===============================
Next BA will announce price increases and new mfg facilities…
===============================
Yay, Eric Schmidt will solve the Middle East crisis by helping Arabs sell ice in the desert! Actually it’s nice that someone in this country is making some sort of positive outreach but it’s not all altruistic – those terrorist videos are very popular on YouTube….
December 5, 2006 at 2:19 pm |
Phil,
Nice call on CME
December 5, 2006 at 2:20 pm |
HYDL is down too, this is very strange coupled with HAL and SLB plunging.
If the transports take off (and they are firming up) I would have to say something is up (or down actually) with long-term demand….
December 5, 2006 at 2:21 pm |
Sorry Phil but someone is already doing that. Mr. Schmidt would be too late.
http://www.skidubai.com/
December 5, 2006 at 2:26 pm |
Phil, scottrade has 45 puts, no 47.50 ?
December 5, 2006 at 2:27 pm |
Phil, sorry on BTU
December 5, 2006 at 2:39 pm |
DOW
Dow Chemical Co. (DOW.N: Quote, Profile , Research) expects continued growth, spurred by its joint ventures in the Middle East and expansion in China and India, President and CEO Andrew Liveris said on Tuesday.
“We believe that by implementing our strategy we can indeed transform our earnings profile,” Liveris said during a presentation at a Citigroup chemicals conference.
“We are much more than just a peaking commodity company,” he added, hinting that the company’s current stock price did not reflect its true value.
Dow has embarked on a number of joint ventures in the Middle East — including projects in Kuwait, Oman and Saudi Arabia — in an effort to counter the soaring cost of natural gas in the United States.
Natural gas is a key feedstock used in making a variety of chemicals, and low natural gas prices in the Middle East have put U.S. chemical makers at a cost disadvantage.
Liveris said investors view Dow as a commodity chemicals company at the peak of its earnings cycle, and they are failing to factoring in Dow’s ability to change its earnings profile.
More here: http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20061205:MTFH83689_2006-12-05_19-28-42_N05314795&type=comktNews&rpc=44
December 5, 2006 at 2:44 pm |
Bill Gross Pimco ..largest bond man on earth says rates 2+% next 12 months …so is that good or bad for stocks ???
TTT
December 5, 2006 at 2:44 pm |
XOM target 80 by Cramer . also bullisht on COP and CVX.
December 5, 2006 at 2:46 pm |
Was having a great day trading until I accidentally sold 900 shares of AAPL while it was rising. Took another loss for the day =/
Tom, I’d short GOOG and AAPL in a crash… they’d lead the crash. I don’t know why Phil won’t. I do get awfully nervous though when I short AAPL. I’m waiting for the options scandel shit to hit the fan… that would be a good day to short APPL.
December 5, 2006 at 2:47 pm |
By accident I mean I thought I set the limit on Scottrade but it was set on market…
December 5, 2006 at 2:52 pm |
Huge put volume in OIH Dec 140’s … 19,000 + contracts today
Phil – Khameni kicking the bucket would be HUGE and would probably result in political chaos in Iran (beyond normal) that would be very beneficial for us.
December 5, 2006 at 2:52 pm |
Ray, Agree. In a crash the stocks getting hit the hardest are the overhyped momo stocks and AAPL is the poster child for those. If the market dives 20%, this thing is going back down to low 50s in no time. And I’ve got Jobs as one of the 3 possible factors triggering a good correction so I’m not keeping overnight until everything is cleared on that front.
December 5, 2006 at 2:55 pm |
Long XLE Jan 61 puts @ $2.00
December 5, 2006 at 3:05 pm |
I’ve been doing the same thing, I don’t hold AAPL overnight even though I think it’s going to 100 if we don’t have a overall market correction. I still think Jobs may go to jail even with the 2 execs getting scape-goated.
December 5, 2006 at 3:18 pm |
THinking about picking up some Coke PUTS….what do you think PHil.
December 5, 2006 at 3:21 pm |
^^^ Jobs won’t go to jail……The reason he won’t is that he “cooperated” with what the SEC has called an investigation and of which we have no resolution or outcome of. Meanwhile the stock has gone from low 60’s to low 90’s in the time frame that we’ve had a whole qtr. to report and they STILL have not come clean on how much $$ he did’nt make from his knowledge of it occurring. From what I’ve read it ends up being about $85m that they will have to account for. I doubt they will account for that amount because they have had enough time from the inception of it’s own investigation to somehow screw with the accounting to make it appear everything was alright from the get go. JMO
M
December 5, 2006 at 3:26 pm |
BTU – oops there are no $47.50s – therefore I’m not interested, maybe $50 puts if iit goes higher
December 5, 2006 at 3:30 pm |
Phil, Any play on Wynn or LVS or not yet?
December 5, 2006 at 3:31 pm |
PHil,
how about SU instead of BTU?
December 5, 2006 at 3:36 pm |
PTEN down huge today and yesterday.
December 5, 2006 at 3:45 pm |
In Feb 07 KO 50 PUTS.
December 5, 2006 at 3:56 pm |
SNDK-picked a little bit up 45. IPhone release will drive NAND prices higher… i know whatever but it will move the stock that’s what matters.
If what the pros say is true and the housing market is slowing the Chinese are building less as will other commodity hungry countries wouldn’t it be wise to short commodities? GLOBAL RECCESION!
BA kicking myself for selling it at 81, might be jumping the gun but on the first pullback i will jump all over it.
December 5, 2006 at 3:59 pm |
Cramer has flip-flopped more on oil than John Kerry ever could
I wrote up something on my blog a few months ago. It was ridiculous at the time. He was changing his view twice a week. You can’t take Cramer seriously on oil.
December 5, 2006 at 4:05 pm |
Sens. Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) and Snowe (R., Maine) sent a letter to ExxonMobil’s CEO.
Here is the full text of the letter:
http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009337
December 5, 2006 at 4:12 pm |
Rockefeller sending a letter to ExxonMobil ?!?
The irony is making me weep.
Back in the OIH Jan 135 puts at 2.10.
December 5, 2006 at 4:25 pm |
WFMI
I just received a pitch from Motley Fool, which linked me to a “Free Report” of the “The New American Super Brand” for big gains now!
The stock they are pitching is WFMI.
Anyone else get the email?
December 5, 2006 at 4:27 pm |
Bill Gross is right, we need to either stop borrowing money or raise rates – which is more likely?
================================
AAPL – the question is how big will the option scandal be in comparison to earnings? With MRVL, it was big and still had no effect. Since we know Jobs gave his up, how much can a few Apple execs possibly have gotten against $2Bn in earnings?
Also, it’s a one-time event that has no material effect on future earnings, which is what you really buy a stock for.
====================================
Iran – unfortunately enough uncertainty to prop up oil today. Spreads may be the way to go – I’ll have to check some out.
====================================
KO – I hope you didn’t take those today! I think they are way undervalued as they collect plenty of money outside the US (ie. real money) that make them a superb safety stock.
=====================================
I’m in LVS, WYNN is a much better co and I wouldn’t mess with him.
=====================================
SU – I got back too late but I’m sure we’ll get a crack at them ahead of inventory. $80 puts will be very tempting but the Iran thing makes me nervous (as it’s intended to!).
======================================
PTEN too! Something is up…
======================================
Commodities – less is a relative term. Just like the builders are making 40% less than the 200% more they made last year…
======================================
This is all part of the last legs (ugly image) of the Roach Motel Theory as the roaches on the inside will do anything to drag people in with them so they can have a chance of escaping.
I get barraged with PR and spin every day from people with agendas who try to get me on board this and that stock so I can only imagine what Cramer must get thrown at him. Whether he intentionally does it or not, he has to be influenced by a barrage of oil bulls tugging on his sleeve at every opportunity.
Also he’s on CNBC – where both C’s stand for Crude!
December 5, 2006 at 4:37 pm |
Phil you cant blame the guy, I’m sure hes got a lot of favors to fill.
Since we are on the subject of KOO KOO Cramer.
Anyone think GE will want to buy thestreet.com, no i am not trying to start a rumor. Cramer killed the radio show, seems he wants to focus more on his website. Could there be something cooking? Seems with all the hoopla about add dollars i think this could be a possibility. ????
December 5, 2006 at 4:45 pm |
Phil,
Send your thoughts to the zmannalpha address Jared has. Thanks.
December 5, 2006 at 4:46 pm |
It’s nice that they are addressing climate change but let’s address the US need for oil in general.
I have a plan:
Double the US energy production, give credits to any company that brings capacity on-line in the next 24 months. We can afford to do this because we make 0 in taxes from oil that is produced outside the US (in fact it’s an expense, rather than a profit) so we can afford extravagant tax breaks.
Roll in a regressive tax that increases as oil gets cheaper. About 1/2 of whatever price under $60 oil falls. Earmark that money to making the US energy self sufficient for the next 100 years (conservation, alternatives, shale oil, coal conversion, nuclear… whatever it takes).
At $50 a barrel a $5 tax would be $100M a day towards energy independence.
Double the SPR and add to reserves at $45 or less, creating a floor that ensures it will be worth it for US companies to keep producing. When we fill that Billion barrels, build another one.
Use expanded SPR (and it needs to be regional and accessable) to control prices – set OPEC-like bands in the $40-$45 range.
Taking out the US as a global importer should pretty much take care of the global price of oil (which we will still buy if it hits our “price bands”).
Our long-range goal should be to become the world’s leading exporter of alternative energy – powering the planet in 2020!
December 5, 2006 at 4:57 pm |
Phil: USD$ does not look good from up here in orbit with the Gold market. USD$ is caught between rock & a hard place and Gold goes higher. I know you like ABX but What do you think of Call on GG and AUY?
December 5, 2006 at 5:09 pm |
Phil are you suggesting we hijack the oil industry and use it so it can benefit mankind!!! Double the US energy production!!
SPR? Stop Prisoner Rape, whats an inmate to do with all that free time? There’s always knitting i suppose.
We need to follow Brazil’s lead its as ez as that, why make things so complicated?
This country has oil pumping through its veins, people could die trying to change or pressure the oil industries. Phil keep it up and therell be nice big glass of koolaid sweetened with some polonium 210 for ya.
December 5, 2006 at 5:32 pm |
WFMI – well now that they’ve pulled back below $50 they are only twice the p/e of the average grocery store!
These guys will be the first ones against the wall when a recession hits, no question about it. I have money and I consider them an indulgence!
At this point they can only really grow by raising prices as they have almost 200 stores and a lot of competition, including 3 of my 4 local markets offering “natural” selections with essentially the same stuff they sell for less money.
I think this is one of those stocks that the users fall in love with but don’t have the fundamentals to support expectations. That being said I think the chart looks ripe for a move to $55 but I won’t play them because I don’t think it will stick and I don’t do pure TA plays.
===============================
No more Cramer radio? Interesting, probably pressure from CNBC to boost his “Stop Trading” segment as they’ve already moved the time slot so something must have been wrong.
This will greatly increase the power of his CNBC spot, might make for some good day trade opportunities…
===============================
Z – I am flattered that you think I have thoughts!
December 5, 2006 at 5:36 pm |
yup, bought the KO Puts at EOD. this thing will pull back within the next couple days (a little bit), i’ll take my 20%, and sell em. Remember, this is a multi year high and there will be some profit taking after such a big move.
meanwhile, trying to figure out when to sell KNOT and WYNN. KNOT at 30, WYNN at 100? problem is KNOT can run so quickly and so easily – plus its always a buyout candidate, but the valuation sometimes scares me.
thoughts?
December 5, 2006 at 5:47 pm |
Brazil uses sugar – we don’t make enough sugar but if we take $100M every single day and put it towards finding a solution for 1,000 days – I have enough faith in the ingenuity of the American people to think we may just come up with something!
Monday: Put $100M towards science magnet programs in high schools – set $10M aside for scholarship competitions for college students – perhaps some grant money for university energy programs
Turesday: Set up a Monthly $10M prize for the best energy saving idea in America – put it on TV, get everyone thinking about it, William Shatner can host.
Wendesday: Send out 100,000 $1,000 checks to everyone who turns in their car for a car that gets 10mpg better this month
Thursday: Select 10 alt energy venture projects of the month to fund
Friday: Allocate $300M (you have Saturday and Sundays money to spend) to major production project that will bring more oil on-line in the next 18 months. Do this 10 times and you will have spent more money to increase production capactiy than XOM does all year!
We could do this now, without the tax but it would cost $36.5Bn a year, almost the cost of a month in Iraq so the government would never approve of it!
December 5, 2006 at 5:49 pm |
Knot $30 but WYNN may be just getting started…
If LVS is worth $100, Wynn is worth $150 – of course we know LVS is not worth $100 so it’s a tricky valuation….
December 5, 2006 at 5:59 pm |
WFMI ~ good analysis Phil. I wasnt buying it, was more wanting your thoughts on how the “great free advice” might affect the stock in the short term. If they are sending that out to everyone today, perhaps the stock might go up tomorrow.
December 5, 2006 at 6:15 pm |
Our man Cramer’s pumping BSX on Thursday’s stent ruling – someone remind me tomorrow as it may make sense to sell calls against 1/2 our position if it really goes crazy as we may get a “black box” type warning on stents that will ultimately mean nothing but may knock it down for a little while.
December 5, 2006 at 6:29 pm |
Any thoughts on a DUK trade in the wake of the recent announcemet of the spinoff of Spectra in Jan 07 (highlighted in the latest Barrons)?
December 5, 2006 at 7:38 pm |
PHIL you just want that 10m dollar prize.
Are there any honest companies out there? If we infiltrate our government and get rid of all the lobbyists and con artists get rid of all the hedge funds clean up wall street etc.etc. How will we ever make money in the markets.
Boeing,clearly this stock is going to 100!
December 5, 2006 at 7:41 pm |
Phil
You said the DIA needs to hold 12300 today(which it did) but i argue it needs to break 12360 to reinforce the current uptrend. If not…look out below??
Anyone else see that gravestone on the Q’s chart today??
Starting to think seriously about some puts here
December 5, 2006 at 8:13 pm |
Hey Phil, why can’t your Dem buddies support offshore drilling ?
(remember, most politicians are useless and corrupt, regardless of party).
Republicans abruptly abandoned plans to seek a House vote on an offshore drilling bill on Tuesday, an acknowledgement that they could not muster a two-thirds majority to clear it without amendments.
Some GOP aides said leaders plan to attach the bill (S 3711) to a package of tax breaks Republicans hope to pass before adjournment, although one leadership aide said no final decision has been made.
Retiring House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., said things are “up in the air” when asked if he would put the offshore drilling measure in a tax extenders bill.
December 5, 2006 at 8:20 pm |
For Phil & anyone else interested.
http://www.article.nationalreview.com
December 5, 2006 10:20 AM
Boltin’
By The Editors
John Bolton’s tenure as America’s U.N. ambassador was, by any measure, a remarkably successful one. But a group of senators implacably opposed to Bush’s foreign policy has spent the past year refusing to assess his work fairly, and has finally succeeded in ensuring that he will never be confirmed in his post. So with his recess appointment set to expire along with the 109th Congress, the ambassador departs — and we are the worse for it.
Bolton, you will recall, was first nominated in 2005. He had more than enough support to win confirmation by the full Senate, but a few members of the Foreign Relations Committee moved heaven and earth to block a floor vote. Their justifications were never convincing. The main contention was that Bolton was not awestruck by the U.N. — as much of the liberal establishment is — and had never been shy about criticizing it when criticism was due. This ought to have been reckoned a merit. In addition, Joe Biden threw a temper tantrum because the White House, citing executive privilege, would not release intelligence documents related to Bolton’s prior post at the State Department. (Bolton, it is worth noting, favored releasing the documents.) And Republican George Voinovich opposed Bolton in a teary-eyed speech for reasons that only George Voinovich understands.
It was clear through all of this that the real problem with Bolton was the administration he was to represent. Derailing his nomination was simply a convenient way of attacking President Bush’s foreign policy. And that is why, after Bolton had spent a year at the U.N., his critics made no serious effort to assess his achievements as ambassador, preferring instead to recycle their spurious attacks on his character. (Voinovich corrected his error and announced that he would now support Bolton. Too late, though, senator: Were it not for your folly a year ago, Bolton would not have had to resign this week.)
In recent hearings, the closest committee Democrats came to making a cogent argument against Bolton was quoting other diplomats’ anonymous smears of him. His aggressive style, said they, had alienated U.S. allies and set back the cause of U.N. reform. To this the obvious reply is 1) that Bolton’s critics provided not the slightest evidence that reform would have been achieved with a different ambassador representing the U.S.; 2) that reform is highly unpopular at the U.N., and anyone who vigorously advocates it will inevitably make enemies; but 3) this is hardly a reason not to advocate it. Turtle Bay is a crooked place. No U.S. ambassador can convert its self-serving bureaucrats and envoys of tyrants to standards of probity worthy of Sir Thomas More. What an ambassador can and should do is articulate correct principles as persuasively as possible, rather than sacrificing moral clarity for the sake of a superficial comity. And that is what Bolton did.
He made powerful arguments against the new U.N. Human Rights Commission, a body as morally bankrupt as its predecessor. He shone the spotlight on the atrocities in Darfur at a time when the world was inclined to forget them. He eloquently and persistently made the case against Iran’s nuclear program. He got the Security Council to pass a resolution sanctioning North Korea for its nuclear test, and put as much pressure as any man could on China actually to enforce it. All of this caps a long career of diplomatic achievements. On proliferation issues in particular, he has been visionary. The Proliferation Security Initiative — a vital tool for interdicting shipments of illicit arms — is his creation.
That he must now leave the U.N. is largely the fault of Lincoln Chafee, the liberal Rhode Island Republican who got a richly deserved electoral thrashing last month. He supported Bolton a year ago but refused to back him this time, effectively killing the nomination. Also at fault is outgoing committee chairman Richard Lugar, whose obsession with keeping his Democratic colleagues happy led him to delay a committee vote again and again and again; the wiser course would have been to put Chafee on the record before the Republican primary in which he faced a strong conservative challenger.
But blame must go above all to the Biden-led Democrats, who felt no qualms about undermining the implementation of U.S. foreign policy, a presidential domain. Their conduct with regard to the Bolton nomination has been even less justified than, for example, filibusters against judicial nominees. Those are objectionable too: but at least judgeships aren’t a branch of the executive. The Democrats have, moreover, hamstrung the administration at a time when the U.S. faces serious — potentially existential — threats from the Middle East and East Asia, and endeavors to counter these threats with sensitive and ongoing diplomatic efforts in which Bolton has played a crucial role.
On the other hand, Kim Jong Il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are probably delighted. Let no one deny that somebody’s interests have been served.
December 6, 2006 at 1:27 am |
Cap there is a power struggle going on in Washington and one wrong move and its off with your head!
December 6, 2006 at 4:49 am |
DUK, I don’t see it as having an effect past the bounce it got on Monday but it’s a very good company so I wouldn’t be expecting it to drop much either. This is a veery nice little dividend payer when you catch them at a low ($30) but not volatile enough to be fun for me.
=================================
Of course I should get a prize for coming up with the whole thing but I would be very happy being in charge of the distribution of money so I could make sure this thing stays on track and doen’t get political!
==================================
BA is going up faster than I wanted it to (I sold the Jan $90s) – hard to believe I had to argue with people that it wasn’t finished in August…
==================================
DIA – yep, we are still not 100% there yet but we are so so close to a breakout I won’t bet against it (actually I still have those $122 puts but only as plunge protection).
QQQQ – possibly the weakest link and must lead “one way or the other”
==================================
Dems support responsible off-shore drilling. The kind where safety protocols are observed and there are verifiable disaster recovery programs in effect, not the joke the oil companies have lobbied for.
Prop 87 had plenty of rules for offshore drilling that allowed it to happen. Dems also want the oil companies to actually pay for the oil they take out of the ground while the bills that get sent around instead give tax breaks to the oil companies.
I learned in my local politics that you can never go by a voting record until you see what kind of junk gets appended to these “reasonable sounding” bills.
Perhaps there should be a quasi independent taxpayer watchdog agency that is given a line item veto. It should be made up of people who don’t live in Washington, don’t know anyone in washington and are unknown to the people (lobbyists) in washington. They could get together and read each bill, cut off anything they don’t like that was attached to it (hopefully everything in most cases) and then send it off to the President for signing.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7JNlezY163M
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_Y37MpPOthU&mode=related&search=
=================================
Yes Cap, we will all miss Bolten, quite a guy…
http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/media_player/play.jhtml?itemId=16806
Let’s not forget what great act earned Bolton this appointment – “after the Supreme Court halted the massive recount, Bolton strode into a library full of officials counting Miami-Dade votes. “I’m with the Bush-Cheney team, and I’m here to stop the vote,” he declared.”
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/07/16/bolton/index.html
“But his competence has ultimately allowed Bolton to do much harm, scuttling the international agreements and treaties that make up much of the legal basis for international order and security. With Bolton’s tireless leadership and assistance, the Bush administration has undermined the International Criminal Court, the Antiballistic Missile Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, and a potential international treaty on small arms trafficking — while also opposing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
“In the process, and in the rush to wage a unilateral and preemptive war in Iraq, Bolton and his administration allies have burned most of the international goodwill that the United States built up before and after Sept. 11. The enemy of a vast and growing percentage of the world, the United States remains virtually alone in Iraq; reports of American soldiers killed in ambushes are now as routine in the news as reports on the stock market. It doesn’t help that the administration lied about some of the intelligence that served as a prime justification for the war.
“Or that Bolton seems interested in possibly taking the war a step further. Soon after Baghdad fell, Bolton said, in his usual, measured way, “We are hoping that the elimination of the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein and the elimination of all of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction would be important lessons to other countries in the region, particularly Syria, Libya and Iran, that the cost of their pursuit of weapons of mass destruction is potentially quite high.” Bolton’s specialty seems to have been the ability to build small bridges that enable him and his allies to destroy big ones. While personally agreeable, he has helped created the policies that have made much of the rest of the world see the United States as an international bully. By forging ties between the hawks in the Defense Department and the White House with the State Department, Bolton has helped to undercut the main government entity supportive of international engagement. By helping to build a relationship between Republican foot soldiers and the neocons, Bolton has helped sever ties between the United States and the rest of the world.”
And that was a positive article on the guy!
December 16, 2006 at 3:27 am |
[...] Getting back to the old escape velocity concept, we’re going to need a lot of dollars to throw on the fire and get this market engine in gear to break orbit. [...]
January 24, 2007 at 1:35 pm |
Phil I think you are full of $hit. I cannot believe these people follow you. Also Kramer is worthless too. There are actually fund managers who do the opposite of what he does suckering in all the people who watch the show and does what he says.
Also, in ethanol we have a solution its called grass. Someone has found a way to make ethanol that is 10 times more efficient than sugar cane which was the most efficient process.
February 2, 2007 at 11:02 pm |
The person has essential Reserves of health but how to keep this reserve longer? WBR LeoP
July 13, 2007 at 9:12 am |
http://www.epinions.com/search/?submitted_form=searchbar&search_string=%3Ca%20href%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fafete.com%2Fen%2Fsearch-Cyprus_Holiday_Rent_Villa.html%3ECyprus%20Holiday%20Rent%20Villa%3C%2Fa%3E&no_results_vertical=t158181&no_results_vertical_name=Car%20Care Cyprus Holiday Rent Villa
netwad88810julep
August 27, 2007 at 10:46 pm |
http://pics.young-lolita-jpg.com/16yo-anomalous-pictures.html 16yo anomalous pictures
November 30, 2007 at 10:57 am |
Winery’s lawsuit against OI dies
Winery’s lawsuit against OI dies on the vineToledo Blade,OH-11 hours ago”We hold that the district court correctly found this action
December 1, 2007 at 3:16 am |
You have the natural advantage in [url=debt-consolidation-adviser.net]negotiating debt settlement[/url] , which may be appropriate for debtors with …
Great Solution
December 15, 2007 at 3:28 am |
http://www.google.com
http://www.yahoo.com
http://www.msn.com
October 21, 2008 at 11:50 pm |
EPN…
EPN…
December 15, 2008 at 3:25 pm |
It’s just about sport
abs sensor ford sport trac
sport – freizeit – blog
ohio sport horses
family sport quotes
girl sport bike pics